Do you care to elaborate or are you just into bashing Fox - or Sean Hannity?

Posted: Dec 6th, 2017 - 11:34 am In Reply to: I actually see - sm

I usually read unexplained attacks against something or someone as written by someone who can't think of something informative or cogent to say. They have to attack the messenger because they don't like the message. Sad.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Silence Breakers named person(s) of the year by - Time magazine. nm (Views: 1020, 2017-12-06, 7:30 am)
- Yes! - They are so brave! (Views: 602, 2017-12-06, 7:55 am)
  - You were not stupid. You were a victim of - our society. (Views: 379, 2017-12-06, 8:10 am)
    - Will and Grace - sm (Views: 347, 2017-12-06, 8:18 am)
      - I really don't get your post. Very confusing - to say the least (Views: 404, 2017-12-06, 8:49 am)
        I actually see - sm (Views: 413, 2017-12-06, 9:03 am)
        It is deflection from the Silence Breakers - to get you to focus away from victims - nm (Views: 352, 2017-12-06, 9:07 am)
        Do you care to elaborate or are you just into bashing Fox - or Sean Hannity?
        Did you read - sm (Views: 389, 2017-12-06, 2:18 pm)
        I was responding to post above mine re the - trash on TV these days. (Views: 439, 2017-12-06, 11:30 am)
- Did that include Juanita Brodderick? - nm (Views: 368, 2017-12-06, 11:14 am)