Let me put it this way. I don't believe I said - I personally would not

Posted: Oct 12th, 2017 - 10:18 am In Reply to: Again, look it up - Link inside sm

benefit, that is yet to be determined once the rest of the plan is revealed. We don't know what tax rates will be and what incomes fall into what tax brackets, unless there is something I missed. I mentioned earlier that the ones that will be hurt are the poor and the ones with kids and the ones who would benefit most would be the wealthy, corporations and some of the middle class, mostly those without kids. I guess I think more of the nation as a whole instead of just how it would or would not benefit me.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Trump's tax plan - well (Views: 847, 2017-10-11, 5:03 pm)
- Itemized deductions going away, standard deduction increasing. - Sounds good to me! sm (Views: 447, 2017-10-11, 7:25 pm)
  - I'm not rich and I itemize my deductions. Anyone - with a house payment, paying (Views: 316, 2017-10-12, 7:02 am)
    - Deductions are called loop holes by the Democrats. - Mortgage deductions WILL NOT be elimited (Views: 297, 2017-10-12, 8:49 am)
      - I was responding to someone who said - only the rich itemize. (Views: 362, 2017-10-12, 9:06 am)
        I didn't say only the rich itemize - Read it again. sm (Views: 357, 2017-10-12, 9:41 am)
        I'm disagreeing with you that "most normal - take the standard deduction (Views: 388, 2017-10-12, 9:47 am)
        Again, look it up - Link inside sm (Views: 284, 2017-10-12, 10:06 am)
        Let me put it this way. I don't believe I said - I personally would not
    - I'm looking at the standard deduction - sm (Views: 311, 2017-10-12, 10:17 am)
      - You can't use the 2016 tax rate because they - are going to make it (Views: 283, 2017-10-12, 10:21 am)
        Okay, let's look at $20,000 - sm (Views: 296, 2017-10-12, 10:56 am)
        I guess we'll have to wait and see. I have - no objection to tax reform (Views: 328, 2017-10-12, 12:04 pm)
        I do believe it will changed significantly before - coming to a vote, but....sm (Views: 298, 2017-10-12, 12:18 pm)
        Now let's flip it and look at the rich - sm (Views: 316, 2017-10-12, 2:42 pm)
  - Personal exemptions are leaving - that's the problem (Views: 345, 2017-10-12, 7:32 pm)
  - Not really. - You have a personal deduction and a standard deduc (Views: 384, 2017-10-12, 10:32 pm)
- So not true. - SM (Views: 375, 2017-10-11, 10:31 pm)
  - I like Trump's tax plan. It worked for JFK and Reagan. - I'm not in favor of any group being (Views: 310, 2017-10-12, 4:28 am)
    - The ultra rich actually pay lower taxes than the upper - middle class because they can hire (Views: 293, 2017-10-12, 4:32 am)
    - I hope the ACA is addressed. As a self employed - businessman my husband (Views: 321, 2017-10-12, 4:37 am)
    - How can you like it when you don't even know - what it is? A few (Views: 267, 2017-10-12, 8:26 pm)
    - Adjusting for real life we made a lot - More back then (Views: 290, 2017-10-15, 8:53 am)
  - I do listen to him. That is where they get - their stories from (Views: 255, 2017-10-12, 9:35 am)
  - I did - I did not listen to MSN (Views: 282, 2017-10-12, 7:33 pm)
- I like the idea of a flat tax. - Less work to fill out forms (Views: 365, 2017-10-12, 8:08 am)
  - I don't see where it is fair. Just as an example - say a 15% flat tax rate (Views: 319, 2017-10-12, 8:45 am)
  - Same here. Use tariffs as taxes. A flat tax would suit - everyone because you are taxed on what (Views: 347, 2017-10-12, 8:47 am)