So I say tax breaks should be based individual - basis according to job growth. nm

Posted: Nov 13th, 2017 - 6:26 pm In Reply to: I totally agree but if there was some way, like - carrier, who got big breaks

s

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Today's Denver Post - oabo (Views: 912, 2017-11-13, 9:54 am)
- I don't care. - sm (Views: 460, 2017-11-13, 10:49 am)
  - I can understand why someone would say they - don't care, but sm (Views: 426, 2017-11-13, 11:05 am)
    - How I look at it... - sm (Views: 469, 2017-11-13, 3:19 pm)
      - I'm for decrease if they bring the jobs back - here. nm (Views: 401, 2017-11-13, 3:43 pm)
        They won't though. They'll just pay it out to shareholders not workers. nm - anony (Views: 419, 2017-11-13, 4:05 pm)
        No proof, no credibility - Nothing but crystal ball rantings (Views: 402, 2017-11-14, 4:26 pm)
        Corporations - oabo (Views: 380, 2017-11-13, 5:02 pm)
        I totally agree but if there was some way, like - carrier, who got big breaks (Views: 412, 2017-11-13, 6:07 pm)
        So I say tax breaks should be based individual - basis according to job growth. nm
        Who do you blame for that? Obama? - I agree -sm (Views: 387, 2017-11-14, 12:59 am)
        Medquist and Nuance - oabo (Views: 444, 2017-11-14, 7:48 am)
        It has everything to do with Obama - sm (Views: 402, 2017-11-14, 9:56 am)
        Wrong. The money offered was irresistible, though a small... - sm (Views: 406, 2017-11-14, 10:31 am)
        The only thing that would possibly have saved MT jobs...sm - VTMT (Views: 500, 2017-11-14, 8:15 am)
        Totally disagree. You have no proof to support - XXXX (Views: 356, 2017-11-14, 5:18 pm)
        I don't know where you have been but I started - losing my work to India (Views: 410, 2017-11-14, 9:51 pm)
    - Classic example of what's wrong with America: - Too many who only care about themselves. (Views: 427, 2017-11-14, 1:50 am)
- To the dislikes of my above post - oabo (Views: 413, 2017-11-13, 10:51 am)
  - I don't care about that either. - LookingAtBigPicture (Views: 440, 2017-11-13, 11:43 am)
    - For $50 more per week max,? Interesting. nm - VTMT (Views: 388, 2017-11-13, 11:57 am)
      - Huh? - nm (Views: 429, 2017-11-13, 12:10 pm)
        $800-2400 tax savings a year is $15- 50 a week, not much... - sm (Views: 408, 2017-11-13, 1:31 pm)
        Putting personal income aside, look at the big picture. - sm (Views: 443, 2017-11-13, 2:05 pm)
      - All speculation...There is no hard core tax plan yet - it has not even gone for reconciliation (Views: 467, 2017-11-14, 3:59 pm)
    - That sounds more like the little, or me, picture. - sm (Views: 387, 2017-11-13, 1:32 pm)
  - Explain how can he benefit personally when he isn't taking a salary - Truthhurts (Views: 447, 2017-11-13, 2:27 pm)
    - The lefties are not getting the full story from their MSM sources. - sm (Views: 411, 2017-11-13, 2:39 pm)
      - There is a full story besides the tax plan itself? - Why would one need MSM? nm (Views: 387, 2017-11-13, 7:52 pm)
    - Apparently you forget he has a business, which - he is still profiting from, (Views: 468, 2017-11-13, 2:59 pm)
    - His family benefits - oabo (Views: 405, 2017-11-13, 5:07 pm)
    - We are not just talking about his presidential salary - sm (Views: 487, 2017-11-13, 7:51 pm)