Is that what Obama did? - Interesting sm

Posted: Oct 13th, 2017 - 11:44 am In Reply to: Seriously? Trump is the one who suggests - revoking news stations

You say, "Don't get rid of something unless you have something better as far as healthcare..."

Obamacare didn't fix anything. It just increased the cost of insurance for everyone at the expense of covering a few more. It made the whole system unstable. Now it's coming down.

I don't judge people based on what I assume they're thinking. When someone follows a law I'm able to admit, in that instance, they're taking the law into account.

He can suggest whatever he wants about the news stations and the NFL. That doesn't have anything to do with this discussion. Neither do his business dealings. If you want to discuss that stuff start a new topic and we can replay it again.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Good job! Lets take healthcare away from - millions of people (Views: 513, 2017-10-13, 9:30 am)
- Scare tactics. It's giving people MORE choices. - No one is having their health care (Views: 598, 2017-10-13, 9:39 am)
  - Tell that to the people who will lose their - insurance. The whole (Views: 369, 2017-10-13, 9:42 am)
  - sounds like the payments are unconstitutional. - If they are not part of the law (Views: 554, 2017-10-13, 9:45 am)
    - It's more about Trump finding a way to - remove the ACA. (Views: 406, 2017-10-13, 9:50 am)
      - If Trump cared, he would break the law? - sm (Views: 399, 2017-10-13, 11:27 am)
        Seriously? Trump is the one who suggests - revoking news stations (Views: 443, 2017-10-13, 11:33 am)
        Is that what Obama did? - Interesting sm
        Ask all the people who got insurance under - the ACA if it is better than it was. (Views: 650, 2017-10-13, 11:47 am)
        I'm sure they're happy. That's how entitlements work. - sm (Views: 574, 2017-10-13, 12:33 pm)
    - This is about getting rid of the subsidies to the insurance - companies. The payments were found to be illegal (Views: 791, 2017-10-13, 11:23 am)
  - What are those choices and when. Even with subsidy - I cannot afford this any longer. sm (Views: 367, 2017-10-13, 10:10 am)
    - The fine is voluntary - sm (Views: 662, 2017-10-13, 11:18 am)
      - Me either. The trick is don't do your taxes to get a - refund. That way they CAN'T (Views: 577, 2017-10-13, 11:24 am)
  - Nothing reveals a bad law like its full - implementation. (Views: 328, 2017-10-14, 4:42 am)
- Scuse me - goodie (Views: 392, 2017-10-13, 11:24 am)
  - AMEN! I was thinking the same thing. - Ditto (Views: 374, 2017-10-13, 11:25 am)
  - People didn't lose their insurance, they lost - plans that didn't fit into (Views: 604, 2017-10-13, 11:37 am)
    - Lesson in capitalism - for socialists sm (Views: 396, 2017-10-13, 11:58 am)
    - Guidelines? Forcing a 59 YO to buy insurance that - covers pregnancies? Forcing (Views: 386, 2017-10-14, 4:39 am)
      - Guess what, we are all STILL forced to buy - insurance that covers Viagra (Views: 391, 2017-10-14, 6:33 am)
    - Completely FALSE STATEMENT - I LOST MY INSURANCE TOTALLY (Views: 382, 2017-10-14, 8:42 pm)
      - Do you live in a state where they took the - expansion? The democrats (Views: 345, 2017-10-14, 11:31 pm)
        Every time this question is asked, nobody - will answer. Wonder (Views: 351, 2017-10-15, 8:26 am)
        yes, and those illegal plans did not cover - what they needed to (Views: 782, 2017-10-15, 8:40 pm)