A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry
be aware, very aware
Posted: Jan 24, 2012
Mr. "Presidint" is giving a speech tonight. Bloggers reporting some sort of hipnotyic methodoligy via CIA will be tested for first time. warns people to not look directly at the "president" but stare at Vice Biden or Mr Boener especially do not listen with mute on. All report back in am to see if any one saw the signs or feels a lot different about him than before. very scaredy.
;
I think there are plans to show the birth video - B&W technology
[ In Reply To ..]
ill effects can be avoided by donning a tin foil hat - ...
[ In Reply To ..]Sadly, I can't tell if you are serious or kidding. Please tell me you're kidding.
I am going to wear my x-ray glasses. - nm - Comrade
[ In Reply To ..]
they will be rendered useless by the force fields - nm
[ In Reply To ..]
Couldn't look at Boehner - he gives me a headache. - Meerkat
[ In Reply To ..]
That's okay, I can't look at Biden - he gives me a migraine
[ In Reply To ..].
"Bloggers?" - WhatBloggers
[ In Reply To ..]What "bloggers?" Could you be any more vague?!
Or are you libs/Dims so bored that you have to make up stupid stuff just to entertain yourselves?
I call hypocrite! - Let me be the first!
[ In Reply To ..]
I call Marxist, Socialist, Communist, Racist! - poor me - Nm
[ In Reply To ..]
Marxist-Socialist-Communist-Racist-poor me - Got adjectives describing Dems right a 2nd time
[ In Reply To ..]x
There must be instructions somewhere on how to follow posts - nm - Optometrist
[ In Reply To ..]
Optometrist - instructions- yeah there is, trying following them
[ In Reply To ..]x
I call hypocrite - Now the Dems are getting it right
[ In Reply To ..]x
What bloggers - Dems have no substance
[ In Reply To ..]I think the White House must be "redistributing" their private stash. These posts are ridiculous and make no sense. Just shows the new low libs can sink to and they still keep digging their trench deeper. At this rate, they will be in China in no time...Oh what, since China is communist may be the destination they seek.
You just described the conservatives. - nm
[ In Reply To ..]
No, she described the dems/liebs to a T - Nice try though
[ In Reply To ..]Trying to turn around an obvious fact I see.
I'd say nice try, but it was no where close
Sorry, but I don't know what liebs are. - Marlene
[ In Reply To ..]
Short for Lieberals - not conservatives or independents, ya know... the other party - should have spelled it out
[ In Reply To ..]Since it's been used, along with crats, pubs, cons, thought Lieberals had a shortcut too. Will spell it out for ya from now on.
I thought the pejorative term was "lib." (NM) - Marlene
[ In Reply To ..]
you thought wrong - "lie"berals perfect description
[ In Reply To ..]X
Oh, I see. Kinda like "cons" meaning "con man politicians." - (nm) Marlene
[ In Reply To ..]
No, con man politician would be both conservatives and LIEberals - nm
[ In Reply To ..]nm needed.
It would be if they didn't lie all the time. Hence the term - LIEberal is accurate
[ In Reply To ..]So there is the LIEbs, pubs, and Indys.
so darn tiresome - nm
[ In Reply To ..]
so darn tiresome - Tell that to the Dems/libs that never know when to
[ In Reply To ..]x
Described "lie"berals - For those that are having difficulty with the term
[ In Reply To ..]All you have to do is read this board with the ridiculous comments that the libs find so enlightening. Something strong in their Kool-Aid today, or maybe their foil hat is too tight. They remind me of the guy at the bus stop that wears his underwear over his pants 'cause he doesn't know any any better. Similar to the lib's posts today. :)
I guess we know who the OP is. - nm
[ In Reply To ..]
No we don't - Enlighten us with your wisdom
[ In Reply To ..]I don't know who the OP is, man or woman. Since you believe you know who everyone is, fill us in.
Is it nm, no moniker, what if, Marlene, Conservative, etc. C'mon you know who it is, enlighten us with your unique fortune telling skills.
Enlighten us with your wisdom - Conservative
[ In Reply To ..]Do not know why I was specifically mentioned in this post. Have absolutely no idea what or who this "OP' is supposed to be or what it is about. I sign what I write unlike so many others on here. On top of that, the stupid threads that go on with no point I don't bother with. I responded to this because the instructions on this board clearly state that personal reference is not to take place??
That was me - - what if
[ In Reply To ..]I wrote it because the poster wrote "I guess we know who the OP is". Which in fact is a lie because nobody knows who anyone is. So I wrote to the poster that if she know who is it, please let us know (enlighten us with her wisdom), so asked her so who is it? Is it me or you or anyone else on the board (just pulled a few monikers off the board not referencing anything anyone said, just wanting to know which one of us it is since she knows). Still waiting to know who she thinks the poster is.
I wasn't actually referencing anything you said, just wanted to know which of us she believes it is.
Sorry for the confusion.
did that get your dander up? - sm
[ In Reply To ..]Typical. That's right, I believe I know who everyone is. Time for your nap now.
tongue in cheek - sm
[ In Reply To ..]I refer you to the post above:
"...or are you libs/Dims so bored that you have to make up stupid stuff just to entertain yourselves?" (!)
That post remained unchallenged by the name-calling, suspicious right - or did I just miss the righteous rage directed at that particular remark?
All of you - talk yourselves down. Conspiracy theories abound.
It will be okay though, - to scream out
[ In Reply To ..]YOU LIE! halfway through the speech.
also it is okay to scream - sm
[ In Reply To ..]loudly at the TV anything you feel strongly about tonight watching the speech unless the neighbors upstairs are home.
I do believe she was referring to how rudely Joe (sm) - Marlene
[ In Reply To ..]Walsh stood up in the middle of the State of the Union to call the President a liar. Simply no class whatsoever.
Got a couple facts wrong there missy - You rock Joe
[ In Reply To ..]1. He didn't stand up.
2. He didn't say "your a liar". He said "lie". - That's because it was.
3. He wasn't rude, just spoke up louder than the craps that used to do it to Bush.
And lastly, 4. Someone finally had the guts to call a lie when they hear it. I'm so sick of the totally outrageous lies and nobody saying anything. Then you had Pee-lousy ruthlessly staring down who ever said it. When I saw that I knew she'd be having one of her nazi fits and would seek revenge. Anyway...there was no difference in what he did to what was done to Bush during his speeches.
Aw, so sorry don't like the crap back that is dished out. Waaaaaaa
I can understand why the facts are so distasteful for you. (nm) - Marlene
[ In Reply To ..]
You don't state facts - Just the typical lib "drive by"
[ In Reply To ..]x
No you don't understand - oh, nothing to add to the conversation besides a drive by - You rock Joe
[ In Reply To ..]Hey you want to add anything to the conversation I'm all ears.
They were not facts the poster I replied to stated. You want the fact then pull up the video and watch it again. You will not find the distortion the poster I replied to said there was.
Again, let me repeat (please read slowly).
1. He didn't stand up.
2. He didn't say "you're a liar". He did point out that what BO said was a lie (which it was).
3. He wasn't rude. Just told the truth. But then again since you don't like the truth of course you would think it's rude.
There understand it, or going to just do more drive by's again
You rock Joe - sm
[ In Reply To ..]There are plenty of tapes, videos to support what you posted. Don't bet on any lib on this board checking the facts; they're too busy checking their tin foil hats to see if they are on straight. They have put up the worst garbage yet today. I guess the talking points haven't arrived yet.
Thanks - I wish they would check facts before spewing - You rock Joe
[ In Reply To ..]It's like the loonies have come out in full force. Loonies because they have no information to back up what they say. I know most of them have been Mathewatized, but they really need to state facts.
Everything is on tape. You can pull it up on youtube and watch it. They won't because they are not interested in the truth or facts.
Check facts - you rock Joe - Conservative
[ In Reply To ..]You said it sister! The posts on this board today are some of the worst ever. No truth, no facts, no sense. Their posts are like a beebee rolling around in a bucket...makes a lot of noise, but pretty useless and serves no purpose.
Am I the only one who had trouble reading that? - Scaredy cat.
[ In Reply To ..]This post was hard for me to decipher quickly. I will, however, take your advice and "not listen with mute on."
Watch the dark channel news ticker during speech - comrade
[ In Reply To ..]it will make the infidels brains explode!
Similar Messages:
For Those Who Are Not Aware Of What Sebelius And Obama (sm)Aug 21, 2012
sneaked through. I'll spoon feed you, just this once with a link. ...
Blair Aware Of Islamist Threat From Iraq War: Ex OfficialJan 21, 2010
By Agence France-PresseWednesday, January 20th, 2010 -- 9:59 pm LONDON — Former prime minister Tony Blair knew that invading Iraq in 2003 could increase the threat from Islamic extremism but pressed ahead nonetheless, a former top civil servant said Wednesday. Speaking at a public inquiry into Britain's role in the controversial war, David Omand added that a claim Saddam Hussein could launch weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) in 45 minutes aimed to add "local colour" to a 2002 dossi ...
Johnson & Johnson Was Aware Of 40% Failure RateJan 23, 2013
From the NY Times: "An internal analysis conducted by Johnson & Johnson in 2011 not long after it recalled a troubled hip implant estimated that the all-metal device would fail within five years in nearly 40 percent of patients who received it, newly disclosed court records show. Johnson & Johnson never released those projections for the device, the Articular Surface Replacement, or A.S.R., which the company recalled in mid-2010. But at the same time that the medical products ...