A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

$100,000 reward


Posted: Sep 20, 2012

 

Breitbart News is doubling its reward--to $100,000--for one of the missing pieces of Barack Obama’s past, which may be the key to understanding his collapsing Middle East policy: the “Khalidi tape,” a video kept under wraps by the Los Angeles Times since April 2008. 

The Khalidi tape shows Obama at a 2003 farewell party for radical Palestinian academic and activist Rashid Khalidi, and reportedly features vitriolic anti-Israel rhetoric.

Reporter Peter Wallsten--now with the Wall Street Journal--revealed the existence of the tape in an article on Obama’s pro-Palestinian background. Obama’s participation in the Khalidi event, Wallsten wrote, had led Palestinian-Americans to believe "that Obama is more receptive to their viewpoint than he is willing to say." 

The article was not aimed at vetting Obama’s past; rather, the tape was likely shared with the Times as a means of pressuring Obama by reminding him of his past commitment to the Palestinian cause as he courted pro-Israel voters and donors.

Accordingly, Wallsten seems to have revealed only enough of what was on the video to achieve that aim. While noting that some speakers accused the Israeli government of terrorism and likened Jewish settlers to Osama bin Laden, Wallsten added that Obama "adopted a different tone...and called for finding common ground." 

Wallsten refused to release the Khalidi tape itself, or a transcript thereof, for readers to examine and judge for themselves.

The ties between Obama and Khalidi are deep, going back to the days when Obama served on the board of the Woods Fund with former terrorist Bill Ayers, and provided funds for Khalidi’s Arab American Action Network. 

The Obama and Khalidi families also developed close personal friendships, which--by Obama’s own admission--affected the way he approached the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the Middle East as a whole.

Notably, Obama's reluctance to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel could reflect Khalidi's influence. 

Khalidi told Israel's Ha'aretz newspaper in 2008 that his family roots in Jerusalem date back more than 500 years, and that his uncle was the mayor of Jerusalem from 1935-7, a key period in the history of the conflict.

Obama broke his 2008 campaign promise to support Jerusalem as Israel's undivided capital. His new position was reflected in the platform fight at the 2012 Democratic National Convention over changes that were likely urged and approved by Obama before controversy erupted and he intervened to restore language supporting Israeli claims.

Given Obama’s muted response to the attacks on U.S. embassies and troops throughout the Middle East today; his refusal to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu next week; his eagerness to sacrifice Americans’ free speech rights in fruitless gestures of appeasement; and his belated but effusive support for the now-radicalized Arab Spring, it is worth examining the roots of his misguided foreign policy.

The Khalidi tape may provide the key. 

The mainstream media has recently been eager to probe the implications of Mitt Romney’s comments at a fundraiser on an incomplete, apparently illegally obtained video tape. Yet it has refused to explore the implications of the Khalidi tape, and has protected Obama from whatever that video might reveal. 

With America under attack, and Israel in existential danger, there is no longer any excuse for the cover-up.

The initial $50,000 reward offered by Breitbart News in July generated much interest--including in Israel--but no credible responses. Inquiries to the Arab American Action Network, and to anti-Israel activist Ali Abunimah, who served on the Network’s board at the time and has criticized Obama’s shift away from his earlier professed beliefs, remain unanswered. 

Accordingly, we have doubled the reward amount in the hope that the source will come forward.

The full sum of $100,000 will be provided to whomever can provide the complete and unedited video and audio of the Khalidi event. The reward is contingent on Breitbart News being able to obtain independent authentication of the video recording, as well as verification that the video recording contains Obama's complete remarks at the event.

;

I've said all along that - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
our president is anti-Israel.

How we ended up electing a man we knew very little about...and still know very little about all the while ignoring the radical connections that we did know about.

When I googled to find more info.... - (S/M)

[ In Reply To ..]
....about this story, I only come up with links to stories on Breitbart, Hannity, and a handful of other sites that look to be right-wing leaners. If I see ONLY sources like this about a story, I question it deeply.

If this is a real, serious, and credible problem for Obama, you would see all kinds of news sources all over it. I don't believe for one minute that the "Lamestream Media," whoever that is, acts as one to suppress damaging news against Obama. That would be tin-foil hat territory, in my opinion!

Googling - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
I googled it and came up with a lot of links and not all conservative. In fact not one of the sites coming up is from Hannity (or as I call him Insanity). I'm on page 7 of the google searches and I still don't see anything from Hannity. I'm seeing articles from a lot of independent sites, but not much (maybe 1 or 2) liberal sites, but then I again I would not expect a liberal media to be talking about this.

I remember hearing about the story a long time ago, nothing lately though honestly I have not watched news in months (we don't have TV), but it is a serious problem, but of course you are not going to see it being talked about in liberal news. The liberal media have always given democrats the upper hand. If there is something wrong or bad going to happen they would rather just ignore it and pretend it didn't happen. You know, like 911 instead of airing the ceremonies going on all over the country they decided to put up the Cardassians.

Here's the mention on Hannity's website.... - n/m

[ In Reply To ..]
n/m
I wasn't doubting that Insanity did a piece I only said - I didn't see his site - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
It's been awhile since I posted (or at least I think awhile, days are blurring together). I didn't doubt that Insanity did a piece. I really don't want to read his article or listen to anything he has to say. He's pompous and arrogant. He's wrong on a lot of issues but will never admit it. He's hateful and spiteful, and shows he is uneducated. He's rude to his guests, invites them on and then insults him. In other words I can't stand him and if I ever hear him say "let your hearts not be troubled" one more time I will stick my hand through the TV and wring his thick neck. So I never doubted he did a piece on it, probably was rude and condescending to his guests. All I was saying was I searched after after 7 pages still was not finding his article and a lot of the searches were not all conservative sites.

Well, when I google... - ....just the words....

[ In Reply To ..]
...."khalidi tape," these are all the sites (below) that come up on the first page. I guess I'm not interested enough to continue clicking on more pages (let alone 7), but I'm not sure what you searched that you didn't see Hannity's site.

redalertpolitics
breitbart (x2)
theblaze.com
pjmedia.com
hotair.com
hannity.com
creators.com
thegatewaypundit.com
nationalreview
chicagoagainstobama (a Wordpress blog)

I believe that most, if not all, of these are Republican, right-leaning, or conservative sites. As stated above, if this was really huge news that's harmful to Obama, all the regular media outlets would be reporting it, too. Maybe not enthusiastically if they're a "liberal media" group; but if they're a serious news outlet, you can't convince me that they would suppress ANY big news item.
Here was what I searched on - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
I did a search in Google on "khalidi transcript". These are the websites on the search:

First page:
democracynow.org (x3) (independent)
a you tube video (but don't feel like watching to find out what it is)
wikipedia.org (no political affiliation)
thegatewaypundit.com (conservative)
ahrcanum.wordpress.com (kind of a weird and qwerky site. I can't tell if it has political affiliation)
jumpingpools.blogspot.com (unsure - too tired to start reading to decipher which way they lean)
poorrichardsnews.com (unsure because I'm trying to get on and it keeps saying I timed out, maybe the site is down, so I don't know)
creators.com (now, got to say this is an interesting site. It give you a chance to click on liberal options or conservative options. I've never seen a site like that so I want to go back and check it out more, might be a good site)

Page 2:
Youtube
Youtube
Mondoweiss (I believe it is a liberal site because it uses a lot of liberal buzzwords you wouldn't hear on a conservative site)
patdollard.com (conservative)
Someone's personal blog.
tundratabloids (conservative)
en.wordpress.com (unsure)
theblogmocracy.com (unsure. Looks conservative, but think its a personal blog. Can't tell)
theblaze (connservative)
independentfilmnewsandmedia (independent)

So if it came across I was doubting you my apologies (I also see that I posted at 3 am, so I must have been tired, but still no excuse). All I meant to say was that as you can see by my searches not all the sites are conservative. Think there is equal number of independent sites, and Hannity's page never came up (which is good because if you read my other post you know I really have no stomach to be able to watch that guy with his ignorance and stupidity.

Similar Messages:


Leaked DNC Documents Show Plans To Reward Big Donors With FederalJul 25, 2016
Democratic National Committee documents recently released by WikiLeaks include spreadsheets and emails that appear to show party officials planning which donors and prominent fundraisers to provide with appointments to federal boards and commissions. The documents, which were circulated among top DNC officials in April, could raise legal questions for the party, says Ken Boehm, the chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, a government watchdog group. “The disclosed DNC emails ...