In those times there was not the scrutiny possible - and presidents could get away with a lot Posted: Jan 27th, 2021 - 2:14 pm In Reply to: Wow, you need to read a little history on the "media" - all the way back to the beginning
Had they had the tech possible as far as the media today being able to scrutinize every little thing and film it, record it, we would probably know a lot more about many things, including the assassinations of JFK, MLK, Bobby Kennedy, etc., but they did not have that then.
It's never good when media covers for the president or others, but come on, Fox News for the entire Trump term? Hannity had bedtime talks every night with Trump, they were completely in the bag for him, they spun and covered for him and are still doing it.
Media is one thing, truth is another. I stick to the premise that if they can't acknowledge Biden won, they are fake news.
If they are so sure there was fraud, media is entirely capable of proving that. Every avenue of proof has been exhausted, and I truly don't care what all these people "believe" - proof is what matters and they did not provide it.
So any person or outlet who refuses to acknowledge President Biden is acting in bad faith and not to be trusted.
Post A Reply Reply By Email Options
Complete Discussion Below: (  marks the location of current message within thread)
|
