Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help M*Modal Nuance New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Games Faith Board Prayer Requests Health Issues


ADVERTISEMENT



Politics

I saw the 60-minute interview - anon

Posted: Nov 30th, 2020 - 4:52 pm In Reply to: In fact, Chris Krebs was the only appointee - who did his job to protect elections

Krebs seemed strangely vague on what he and his team actually did to protect our November election. I wanted to hear actual details and see the proof with my own eyes...

From first-hand reports of those who actually witnessed the ballot processing, there were many questionable activities taking place in the vote centers that posed serious vulnerability issues with the vote count. The reports were eerily similar in each of the battleground states. Signature verification was not adhered to consistently and opened wide the potential for fraudulent ballots. Voter lists that haven't been routinely purged and updated for years of deceased voters allowed for countless mailed ballots to go out, etc., etc. Using a controversial electronic election voting system associated with easy vote tampering capability is an open invitation for election fraud, but it was used anyway. All of these vulnerabilities still exist to this day baffling the mind!! And the Dems can't understand why the integrity of our elections is in serious doubt now by millions and millions of voters.

Krebs just seemed very shifty to me. He said, "we did the right thing." Yeah, I wonder about that right thing...

ADVERTISEMENT


Post A Reply Reply By Email Options


Complete Discussion Below: ( marks the location of current message within thread)