Because it's sad, maybe? - nm

Posted: Jul 29th, 2020 - 8:54 am In Reply to: Back with the "sad" routine? - What's sad is that you think

What is sad is that I have to even explain the simplest things. Coming from a person who may think Breitbart, Twitter and Hannity are impartial information, thank you for the view on NBC but I think I'll stick with them because this is what happened.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Dark money involved in Trump's conspiracy - theory post. (Views: 430, 2020-07-29, 8:18 am)
- Back with the "sad" routine? - What's sad is that you think (Views: 244, 2020-07-29, 8:39 am)
  - Because it's sad, maybe? - nm
    - We think for ourselves and - come to conclusions after objective (Views: 136, 2020-08-05, 7:25 pm)
- Big tech floods house judiciary with cash...so much for the - antitrust review. What a difference (Views: 207, 2020-07-29, 1:39 pm)
- What is sad is that many doctors from all over the world - believe in HCQ. The black female (Views: 228, 2020-07-29, 1:43 pm)
  - To the poster who reported this - Moderator (Views: 229, 2020-07-29, 9:52 pm)
    - To the poster who reported my message - Moderator - sm (Views: 199, 2020-07-30, 2:40 pm)
- IMPOTUS is but one feather flocking round' said bird. - SouthernBorderMT (Views: 191, 2020-07-30, 11:58 am)