Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help M*Modal Nuance New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Games Faith Board Prayer Requests Health Issues


ADVERTISEMENT



Politics

Planned Parenthood Exec Makes Major Admission - About Baby Body Part Harvesting

Posted: Sep 14th, 2019 - 5:47 am In Reply to: And you all believed this...the lies about PPP - You know who you are

During the preliminary hearing this week in the criminal case against undercover journalists David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt, a "semi-retired" Planned Parenthood executive admitted that the abortion business had no ban on altering abortion procedures in order to better harvest baby body parts that would later be sold, allegedly for a profit.

According to reporting from Lianne Laurence at LifeSiteNews, "Doe 10," the former medical director at Planned Parenthood Los Angeles until 2013, "admitted under questioning Wednesday by Peter Breen of the Thomas More Society and lawyer for Daleiden, that the Planned Parenthood affiliates she worked in had no rule against changing the abortion procedure 'technique' in order to obtain better baby body parts."

As noted by Laurence, "federal consent rules stipulate a doctor cannot change the method of a medical procedure without a patient's consent."

"'Doe 10' testified that Planned Parenthood abortionists 'would never change the method' but admitted Planned Parenthood began making the distinction between 'technique' and 'method' after the [Center for Medical Progress] undercover videos were released,” the report noted.

"We had to grapple with fallout from videos," the abortion executive, who is not allowed to be named, admitted to the court. "We had to be more specific."

Mr. Breen, who is representing Daleiden, emphasized to the outlet that "Doe 10" was essentially playing semantics. "There is no distinction between 'method' and 'technique' in the law, and there is no distinction between method and technique in medical ethics," he said....

ADVERTISEMENT


Post A Reply Reply By Email Options


Complete Discussion Below: ( marks the location of current message within thread)