So, she's not going to testify without full investigation - Truthhurts Posted: Sep 19th, 2018 - 10:08 am
1. How do you investigate something if you don't know the date, time, place?
2. Why is there another attorney doing the interviews now? The other attorney said she was willing to testify. This one says not without a full FBI investigation.
3. Kavanaugh was vetted with a full FBI investigation over 6 times. Where was she then? Why is another investigation necessary?
3. Funny that she can't even remember who was there. First it was her, Kavanaugh and this Max guy. Now it's 4 guys and another girl.
4. Why was it confidential then all of a sudden, out in the open with her consent and why Feinstein held onto it and didn't turn it over to the FBI immediately; and why wait until the last day of the hearings to bring this up?
5. Why was one of the questions Kamala (D-CA) asked Kavanaugh (in the hearing) if he ever cheated on his wife? Strange question unless she knew about the letter from the beginning. In fact, was she party to this letter at all? That seems quite suspicious. No one else has brought up this question.
6. Is this "revenge" against him because his mother presided over her parents bankruptcy trial? I doubt it but you never know what's in a person's head.
Now she's upset because her email was hacked and she's had to leave her residence because of threats? Now THAT should be investigated. Did she think everyone would be on her side?
I didn't think she would testify. She kept changing her story and she ignored Grassley's request to tesify in public or behind closed doors until she could think up a good excuse. The FBI investigation was the only one she could come up with and she also knew that the FBI had already stated there was no need to investigate.
Grassley and others on the committee have bent over backwards to give her the benefit of the doubt. Their patience has run out. Either she testifies Monday or they vote on Thursday. He sees through the Dems delay tactics and is tired of the antics.
As something I need to check....someone on another site stated the attorneys are part of the Soros network. Haven't verified that yet. if it's true, then that explains it all.
Post A Reply Reply By Email Options
Complete Discussion Below: ( marks the location of current message within thread)
|