The world is going crazy. Graffiti, even when it destroys - property, is now considered a Posted: May 24th, 2018 - 4:35 am In Reply to: That's the same judge that called Sarah Palin's down syndrome - child, Trig, a prop. Wonder how she
"first amendment right"
A "graffiti artist" was awarded $6.7 million in Long Island even though the graffiti was created on someone else property.
"Though Mr. Wolkoff’s lawyers had argued that the buildings were his to treat as he pleased, the jury found he violated the Visual Artists Rights Act, or V.A.R.A., which has been used to protect public art of “recognized stature” created on someone’s else property." NYT
I wonder how the outcome of this would have gone if the graffiti was on the walls of the judge’s gated community?
LINK/URL: The world is going crazy. Graffiti, even when it destroys
Post A Reply Reply By Email Options
Complete Discussion Below: (  marks the location of current message within thread)
|
