Charles Crenshaw, M.D., Surgeon DESTROYS the Official JFK Narrative - WarrenReportBogus

Posted: Feb 11th, 2018 - 4:03 pm In Reply to: 33 "Conspiracy Theories" that have Existed Since the Dawn of Man - Points

Years ago - - when MSM still had a modicum of decency -- ABC's 20/20 interviewed Charles Crenshaw, M.D., the surgeon who attended JFK in the Parkland Hospital ER in Dallas.

Fearful for his safety, Dr. Crenshaw waited years to come forward with the truth. In this interview he reveals that -- after examining JFK's wounds -- there were AT LEAST ONE AND POSSIBLY TWO OTHER SHOOTER(S).

Dr. Crenshaw wrote a book on this too -- JFK Has Been Shot. It was a NYT Bestseller.

https://www.amazon.com/JFK-Has-Been-Shot-Parkland-ebook/dp/B00CICDDF2/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1518386511&sr=1-1&keywords=charles+Crenshaw+Parkland+JFK&dpID=51hlTi%252Bj6zL&preST=_SY445_QL70_&dpSrc=srch

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPcH1RNMC6M

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

33 "Conspiracy Theories" that have Existed Since the Dawn of Man - Points (Views: 532, 2018-02-11, 3:13 pm)
- Charles Crenshaw, M.D., Surgeon DESTROYS the Official JFK Narrative - WarrenReportBogus
- What does this mean to you - Seer (Views: 306, 2018-02-11, 6:58 pm)
  - If anybody can find Ben Long's official interpretation (i.e., the artist), please DO copy here. - sm (Views: 267, 2018-02-12, 2:29 am)
    - Honestly, I am not familiar with Ben Long - but trying to help you out (Views: 250, 2018-02-12, 9:57 am)
      - No, it's Benjamin Long the painter, who painted the frescoes in Seer's post - thanks (Views: 300, 2018-02-12, 11:10 am)
    - No extrapolation necessary. - NotASheep (Views: 296, 2018-02-12, 11:10 am)
      - Nope, just what I meant, inferring from the specific to the general, often at the risk of producing - meaningless results. (Views: 219, 2018-02-12, 11:31 am)
        That's called DEDUCTIVE reasoning. - NotASheep (Views: 285, 2018-02-12, 11:35 am)