Home Contact Us

ADVERTISEMENT

Okay, I'll explain - you didn't do your research - to find the truth - sm

Posted: Jan 13th, 2018 - 10:28 pm In Reply to: Something else for you - to explain away.

First, the article you posted was a New York Times article, which they have proven do not tell the truth. So, let me break down what actually happened.

(Didn't put the first sentence of the paragraph because it used swear words not allowed here)...the Wall Street Journal has picked this weekend to revive a rumor that it first published shortly after the election, and which President Trump’s lawyers have previously denied." (note the word "rumor". A rumor is not the truth all the time.

"Clifford claims that her encounter with Trump was consensual, and the White House dismissed the story as a “recycled report”. - See that? The key word is "consensual". Unlike what Clinton did with the his line of women. Aww, but we don't want facts to get in the way of their fantasy now, do we.

“These are old, recycled reports, which were published and strongly denied prior to the election,” a White House official said, responding to the allegation of a sexual encounter involving Mr. Trump and Ms. Clifford. The official declined to respond to questions about an agreement with Ms. Clifford. It isn’t known whether Mr. Trump was aware of any agreement or payment involving her.

Again..."It isn't known whether Mr. Trump was aware of any agreement or payment involving her".

She also signed a statement that said “Rumors that I have received hush money from Donald Trump are completely false,” the statement said.

It's getting pretty tough with all the fantasy stories coming out to be lies now, isn't it.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-12/trump-reportedly-paid-porn-star-130000-sign-nda

ADVERTISEMENT

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Something else for you - to explain away. (Views: 417, 2018-01-13, 7:58 am)
- I guess the Russian collusion thingie is not - working out for you, eh? (Views: 386, 2018-01-13, 8:40 am)
  - There is a long laundry list, eh? - nm (Views: 338, 2018-01-13, 8:46 am)
  - It's not in place - of (Views: 270, 2018-01-13, 8:48 am)
    - Simplistic Republican world - Only one problem at a time (Views: 354, 2018-01-13, 10:25 am)
  - Exactly! When one of their conspiracy theories don't work - they try something else (Views: 341, 2018-01-13, 9:51 pm)
- STORMY - Climate change?? (Views: 340, 2018-01-13, 10:20 am)
  - Stormy relates to WEATHER, not "climate." - Knowledge (Views: 344, 2018-01-13, 11:44 am)
    - It would work for Republicans to take - Down Trump...no knowledge (Views: 267, 2018-01-13, 6:54 pm)
- Okay, I'll explain - you didn't do your research - to find the truth - sm