So what is the logic - here?

Posted: Jan 12th, 2018 - 2:42 pm In Reply to: There was another EPA toxic spill in 2015 in Colorado. - Two events over a short period of time.

Because the EPA had some unfortunate accidents that justifies more pollution by the oil and gas industry? We should be concerned about all of these incidents regardless of who is responsible.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Article in today's Denver Post - oabo (Views: 645, 2018-01-12, 10:37 am)
- Five so far on the Keystone pipeline. - nm (Views: 340, 2018-01-12, 11:08 am)
- EPA spills again in Colorado. The EPA is admitting to a spill - from a treatment plan it set up after (Views: 343, 2018-01-12, 11:08 am)
  - There was another EPA toxic spill in 2015 in Colorado. - Two events over a short period of time. (Views: 375, 2018-01-12, 11:11 am)
    - So what is the logic - here?
- You act like Trump is the only president who had accidental spills - sm (Views: 332, 2018-01-12, 11:09 am)
  - I didn't say that Trump - was the only one (Views: 392, 2018-01-12, 11:17 am)
    - You act like clean energy is illegal - sm (Views: 393, 2018-01-12, 12:25 pm)
- This article is just political opportunism. Can't find anything - by this author on EPA spills. (Views: 370, 2018-01-12, 11:25 am)
  - There was plenty - in the Colorado papers (Views: 319, 2018-01-12, 2:46 pm)