How we know Mueller has no evidence for collusion on Trump - Laugh's on me Posted: Jan 14th, 2019 - 12:27 pm
People will say "We don't know what Mueller has on Trump, it takes time to build a case." This is true.
But the case against Trump isn't a criminal prosecution, if anything it's a political one. (Don't forget that the DOJ has repeatedly said that Trump isn't a target of the investigation.) A political case for impeachment doesn't need to meet a burden of proof. All you need to do is convince Congress that the President needs to go.
If Mueller could credibly accuse Trump of being a traitor, his patriotic duty to the country would require him to come out with that information ASAP. Congress (assume they're all patriots as well) would have to impeach. All of this should have happened a long time ago.
What about all the people associated with Trump who have been convicted of crimes? What about it? Were any of them convicted of collusion? Or trying to fix the election results? Nope.
Now ask yourself, "as Mueller investigates, does he even have the option of ignoring other crimes that he finds which are not collusion-related?" Probably not. That being the case, the non-collusion crimes currently being prosecuted do not in any way indicate wrongdoing on the part of Trump. This fact has been shown based on the crimes being prosecuted and the dates those crimes occurred.
Post A Reply Reply By Email Options
Complete Discussion Below: (  marks the location of current message within thread)
|
