Hardly calling for inciting a riot, - merely suggesting confrontation Posted: Jun 24th, 2018 - 12:42 pm In Reply to: Incitement to riot used to be a felony. She is virtually calling - for violence. This is anarchy.
When you recognize one of these lowlifes who provide cover for this nasty administration and one has to assume agree with it. Maybe just yell out a question or two and see if it gets answered there, since it never does seem to get answered in press conferences or any other venue.
Why shouldn't they be called on to justify what is going on to the public, who are after all their bosses, not Trump?
Honestly, anarchy? I think anarchy is what we have now under Trump. "Government" by a toddler and his fits of rage and incoherent tweets which are full of lies.
Those who carry his water should be able to answer a few questions and defend the terrible policies they are carrying out, incoherently or otherwise.
Or they can just run away, I guess, or go to fancy places where they won't be disturbed like that Pruitt who only flies first class because he must be protected from the general public who don't like what he's doing (and we're paying for that privilege - what he feels is his right to be protected from us, think about that for a second).
Hardly incitement to riot, merely encouragement to exercise our first amendment right to hold our government officials to account.
Post A Reply Reply By Email Options
Complete Discussion Below: (  marks the location of current message within thread)
|
