Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help M*Modal Nuance New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Games Faith Board Prayer Requests Health Issues


ADVERTISEMENT



Politics Latest Messages: rotator cuff tear ..

A theory: See if you agree - sm

Posted: Feb 12th, 2018 - 3:56 pm In Reply to: So a hit piece on liberals is listening to - other people?

Theory:
One way to stop listening and close your mind off to other opinions is to call articles you disagree with "hit pieces;" Even though that article discusses scientific research by academics such as Jonathan Haidt and Jordan Peterson.

Would you say the statement above is true or false?

To continue the discussion, I would ask:
Why take that "hit piece" stand in the first place?

We're all adults here. If you disagree with the topic presented, you can cite the conflicting scientific data that has informed your view. You can also state why you feel the cited data in the "hit piece" is wrong. Why not engage in the discussion?

Instead you choose to make a judgment and throw Jesus into the mix. Why? Do you not want to have a rational discussion of these findings?

ADVERTISEMENT


Post A Reply Reply By Email Options


Complete Discussion Below: ( marks the location of current message within thread)