Democrats don't trust free markets, they prefer to use the - power of the govt to control the

Posted: Dec 28th, 2017 - 12:11 pm In Reply to: Substitute "the rich" - sm

economy. And they don’t understand basic laws of supply and demand.

They believe the government should have control of everyone’s money.

Corporations should have it dictated to them how they should spend their money.

I am as capitalist as any, but this is not our daddy's capitalism. What we've witnessed in the past few years is some sort of perverted crony capitalism/socialism and globalism/utopian social engineering.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Do you really support the wealthy - All of their wishes and dreams...OR (Views: 1016, 2017-12-28, 10:27 am)
- Substitute "the rich" - sm (Views: 534, 2017-12-28, 11:03 am)
  - I would say that definitely depends - On where you live (Views: 398, 2017-12-28, 11:26 am)
  - Democrats don't trust free markets, they prefer to use the - power of the govt to control the
    - Banana Republic 101. - LOL (Views: 367, 2017-12-29, 11:19 am)
- Corporate taxes are paid by the owners through lower - dividends and stock values, customers (Views: 369, 2017-12-28, 12:07 pm)
  - You might not see the reason why there - should be laws to keep (Views: 457, 2017-12-28, 1:52 pm)
- What I hear you saying is - sm (Views: 354, 2017-12-28, 3:18 pm)
  - Though I don't - agree with what the (Views: 402, 2017-12-28, 3:44 pm)
    - What do you want to do then? - sm (Views: 396, 2017-12-28, 4:35 pm)
      - I don't know how to fix - corrupt. (Views: 395, 2017-12-28, 7:59 pm)
        You don't fix corruption, you prosecute it - sm (Views: 344, 2017-12-29, 2:42 am)
        On the charity part - of the post (Views: 341, 2017-12-29, 8:06 am)
        By getting rid of the individual mandate, that is in effect - a tax cut of sorts. I'm grateful for (Views: 370, 2017-12-29, 8:36 am)
        Well, you and I see differently on - that one. (Views: 367, 2017-12-29, 9:18 am)
        It's unconstitutional. I understand why it's needed for Obamacare - to work, it's a tax on people (Views: 364, 2017-12-29, 9:33 am)
        I said I know the argument against the mandate, - but feel it should be dealt (Views: 367, 2017-12-29, 9:44 am)
        I disagree. Republicans are not bound and determined to - get rid of Obamacare.They had their (Views: 368, 2017-12-29, 9:48 am)
        That's correct. It is unconstitutional, it originated in the - Senate and tax laws originate in the House. (Views: 563, 2017-12-29, 9:46 am)
        Tax cuts - Prosecute corruption sm (Views: 356, 2017-12-29, 5:57 pm)