Initial assertion is unsupported. - ThePoint/ThinkingMT

Posted: Nov 25th, 2017 - 2:33 pm In Reply to: Your point? - nm

"claimed that Republican administrations had been much more criminally corrupt over the last 50 plus years than the Democrats"

Using official crime numbers -- or, in this case of the political area, PROSECUTED/PURSUED crimes -- you cannot support that assertion.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Why I don’t vote republican...sm - Author unknown (Views: 1053, 2017-11-25, 1:49 pm)
- The dark figure of crime. - Mary (Views: 748, 2017-11-25, 1:51 pm)
  - Your point? - nm (Views: 528, 2017-11-25, 1:56 pm)
    - Initial assertion is unsupported. - ThePoint/ThinkingMT
  - Hahahahahahahahaha - hawkmt (Views: 535, 2017-11-25, 2:58 pm)
    - What an erudite response. - Sarc (Views: 463, 2017-11-26, 3:45 pm)
- Bogus all the way since Obama shut down, along - With Holder and Lynch ANY (Views: 542, 2017-11-25, 2:19 pm)
  - Yes. That points directly to the - DarkFigureofCrime (Views: 508, 2017-11-25, 2:43 pm)
  - Maybe you are the one who needs to learn how to research? - nm (Views: 504, 2017-11-25, 4:39 pm)
    - Nope - throwing your snark aside, my research of Obama - cover ups well documented (Views: 602, 2017-11-25, 4:44 pm)
      - Please do tell - sm (Views: 516, 2017-11-25, 9:41 pm)
        Clearly you do not, nor have you researched anything - Otherwise, you would have the answer (Views: 744, 2017-11-26, 1:46 pm)
        It's so funny - sm (Views: 672, 2017-11-26, 2:49 pm)
        When someone relies on left-wing extremist knee - jerk responses - discussion is (Views: 475, 2017-11-26, 6:17 pm)
        No clue - sm (Views: 496, 2017-11-26, 8:46 pm)
        LOL - what a bunch of left BS - Nice try at the spin (Views: 449, 2017-11-26, 6:20 pm)
        Yes - sm (Views: 457, 2017-11-26, 8:37 pm)
- Is criminal corruption different than corruption? - Basic Logic sm (Views: 521, 2017-11-25, 6:27 pm)
  - Perfect way to explain the disrespect for the rule of law - that Obama Admin exercised (Views: 691, 2017-11-25, 6:29 pm)
  - So who - sm (Views: 516, 2017-11-25, 9:50 pm)
    - OMG - SMH (Views: 490, 2017-11-26, 7:20 am)
      - OMG!! - sm (Views: 945, 2017-11-26, 7:27 am)
        Look no further than the Oblunder administration. - different poster (Views: 591, 2017-11-26, 9:27 am)
        Lol - sm (Views: 770, 2017-11-26, 2:56 pm)
        Lol...we all lived through the hell of obama - and the damage and lies of obama (Views: 475, 2017-11-26, 6:42 pm)
    - It's an amazing time... You can literally Google "look the other way" - Basic Logic sm (Views: 664, 2017-11-26, 11:26 am)
      - So I ask - sm (Views: 520, 2017-11-26, 3:09 pm)
        Hahahaha. Leftie's attempt at deflection - and denial (Views: 456, 2017-11-26, 6:18 pm)
        I've learned how to deflect well from the right wingers. - sm (Views: 451, 2017-11-26, 8:52 pm)
        I'm not sure I understand your point... - Basic Logic sm (Views: 461, 2017-11-26, 11:01 pm)
        Trying to say - sm (Views: 475, 2017-11-27, 7:34 am)
        Assume I agree with 90% of what you're saying... - Basic Logic sm (Views: 407, 2017-11-27, 7:26 pm)
  - Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner. - DarkFigureofCrime (Views: 482, 2017-11-26, 9:00 pm)
    - LOL! I just took your advice and looked that up. - Basic Logic sm (Views: 466, 2017-11-26, 11:17 pm)
      - It's a criminology term... - Student (Views: 420, 2017-11-26, 11:26 pm)
- May we see your "research" please? - Thank you. (Views: 516, 2017-11-25, 8:02 pm)
  - They have no research for support this post - Don't hold your breath (Views: 446, 2017-11-26, 6:48 pm)
  - The OP didn't research this - Basic Logic sm (Views: 704, 2017-11-26, 10:26 pm)
- Is this your source? - sm (Views: 454, 2017-11-26, 11:12 pm)
- Bahahahaa! You're not really taking a made-up FB post as factual... - Are you? (Views: 410, 2017-11-27, 4:27 am)