That sounds more like the little, or me, picture. - sm

Posted: Nov 13th, 2017 - 1:32 pm In Reply to: I don't care about that either. - LookingAtBigPicture

Although I do agree with you about the Clintons, which is no longer relevant anyway. I do wonder how many people do look at the "big picture," and what the current tax plan will do to many people, and to all of us in the long run. Have they tried to think about it logically on a large scale rather than just "how it affects me right now." I really would not consider more thought on the matter obsessing. I would call it trying to be informed regarding mathematical facts. Thanks for your thoughts though.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Today's Denver Post - oabo (Views: 910, 2017-11-13, 9:54 am)
- I don't care. - sm (Views: 458, 2017-11-13, 10:49 am)
  - I can understand why someone would say they - don't care, but sm (Views: 425, 2017-11-13, 11:05 am)
    - How I look at it... - sm (Views: 467, 2017-11-13, 3:19 pm)
      - I'm for decrease if they bring the jobs back - here. nm (Views: 400, 2017-11-13, 3:43 pm)
        They won't though. They'll just pay it out to shareholders not workers. nm - anony (Views: 417, 2017-11-13, 4:05 pm)
        No proof, no credibility - Nothing but crystal ball rantings (Views: 400, 2017-11-14, 4:26 pm)
        Corporations - oabo (Views: 379, 2017-11-13, 5:02 pm)
        I totally agree but if there was some way, like - carrier, who got big breaks (Views: 410, 2017-11-13, 6:07 pm)
        So I say tax breaks should be based individual - basis according to job growth. nm (Views: 377, 2017-11-13, 6:26 pm)
        Who do you blame for that? Obama? - I agree -sm (Views: 384, 2017-11-14, 12:59 am)
        Medquist and Nuance - oabo (Views: 443, 2017-11-14, 7:48 am)
        It has everything to do with Obama - sm (Views: 401, 2017-11-14, 9:56 am)
        Wrong. The money offered was irresistible, though a small... - sm (Views: 404, 2017-11-14, 10:31 am)
        The only thing that would possibly have saved MT jobs...sm - VTMT (Views: 500, 2017-11-14, 8:15 am)
        Totally disagree. You have no proof to support - XXXX (Views: 354, 2017-11-14, 5:18 pm)
        I don't know where you have been but I started - losing my work to India (Views: 407, 2017-11-14, 9:51 pm)
    - Classic example of what's wrong with America: - Too many who only care about themselves. (Views: 424, 2017-11-14, 1:50 am)
- To the dislikes of my above post - oabo (Views: 412, 2017-11-13, 10:51 am)
  - I don't care about that either. - LookingAtBigPicture (Views: 438, 2017-11-13, 11:43 am)
    - For $50 more per week max,? Interesting. nm - VTMT (Views: 386, 2017-11-13, 11:57 am)
      - Huh? - nm (Views: 426, 2017-11-13, 12:10 pm)
        $800-2400 tax savings a year is $15- 50 a week, not much... - sm (Views: 406, 2017-11-13, 1:31 pm)
        Putting personal income aside, look at the big picture. - sm (Views: 442, 2017-11-13, 2:05 pm)
      - All speculation...There is no hard core tax plan yet - it has not even gone for reconciliation (Views: 466, 2017-11-14, 3:59 pm)
    - That sounds more like the little, or me, picture. - sm
  - Explain how can he benefit personally when he isn't taking a salary - Truthhurts (Views: 445, 2017-11-13, 2:27 pm)
    - The lefties are not getting the full story from their MSM sources. - sm (Views: 409, 2017-11-13, 2:39 pm)
      - There is a full story besides the tax plan itself? - Why would one need MSM? nm (Views: 384, 2017-11-13, 7:52 pm)
    - Apparently you forget he has a business, which - he is still profiting from, (Views: 466, 2017-11-13, 2:59 pm)
    - His family benefits - oabo (Views: 405, 2017-11-13, 5:07 pm)
    - We are not just talking about his presidential salary - sm (Views: 486, 2017-11-13, 7:51 pm)