They are a right-winged site. If they were - really for "judicial watch"

Posted: Sep 17th, 2017 - 11:24 pm In Reply to: Why don't you go read the emails for yourself ? - Truthhurts

they would also have questionable things about Trump. It's nothing more than a typical right-winged site, slamming Hillary and Obama. Could be this site is Koch funded. After glancing through this site, I see anything and everything that Trump and his supporters repeat over and over and over. I have said it before and I'll say it again. If any of this was "big news" it would be all over "MSM." It seems they are not a judicial watch otherwise there would be all the questionable things Trump has done. Nice try though.

Post A Reply Reply By Email Options

Use Rich Text Editor with Full Options CLOSE

Edit/Delete Message

Report this message

X CLOSE

Complete Discussion Below: (

marks the location of current message within thread)

Hillary/Uma lies about emails never stop - No surprise Clinton greed outweighs (Views: 735, 2017-09-15, 2:09 pm)
- I have still not recovered - sm (Views: 530, 2017-09-15, 2:21 pm)
  - Me either - Rita in Roma (Views: 415, 2017-09-15, 2:24 pm)
- Maybe if Hillary had actually performed the duties - Rita in Roma (Views: 374, 2017-09-15, 2:22 pm)
- Hillary never ceases to amaze me. She is - a brazen liar and her greed is unbelievable. (Views: 394, 2017-09-15, 3:23 pm)
  - It should have come as no surprise voters rejected Hillary - even her husband rejected her for Monica. (Views: 436, 2017-09-16, 4:14 pm)
    - So, It's a wife's fault if her husband cheats? - nm (Views: 320, 2017-09-16, 4:23 pm)
      - Would you want to be married to Hillary? - I doubt any real man would want to. (Views: 399, 2017-09-16, 7:10 pm)
    - Hillary! The Evil! - Sara (Views: 552, 2017-09-18, 2:31 pm)
- Funnier that this stuff is only on right-winged - sites, though I am sure (Views: 368, 2017-09-16, 8:10 am)
  - Why don't you go read the emails for yourself ? - Truthhurts (Views: 352, 2017-09-17, 4:10 pm)
    - They are a right-winged site. If they were - really for "judicial watch"