A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

Dershowitz: "Ethnic and Racial Composition" of


Posted: Aug 5, 2017

Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s decision to impanel a grand jury in Washington, D.C. will prove “very unfavorable” to President Trump, in part because of the “ethnic and racial composition” of jury members, says constitutional lawyer Alan Dershowitz. “I think it’s a tactical move designed to send a message that if the prosecutor decides to prosecute, he will have a real advantage with the jury pool where the case will be held,” Dershowitz said in an interview on Friday with WABC radio host Rita Cosby. The retired Harvard Law School professor was responding to new reports that Mueller has impaneled a grand jury in Washington D.C. in addition to one already active in Alexandria, Va. The Virginia grand jury has reportedly been issuing subpoenas as part of an investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. But Mueller’s decision to impanel a new grand jury in a different jurisdiction has been the subject of heavy analysis. The formation of a new grand jury is being interpreted as a signal that Mueller’s investigation into potential collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian government is heating up. The grand jury will have the power to issue subpoenas and compel witnesses to testify under oath. Some legal analysts noted that Mueller is more familiar with judges in the DC court as opposed to the one in Alexandria. The DC court is also much closer geographically to the special counsel’s office than is the court in Virginia. Dershowitz’s analysis adds another variable to the mix. “It gives the prosecutor the power to indict in the District of Columbia, which is a district that is heavily Democratic, and would have a jury pool very unfavorable to Trump and the Trump Administration,” said Dershowitz, a Democrat who has at times defended Trump against what he sees as an overzealous collusion investigation. “It gives the prosecutor a tremendous tactical advantage,” he continued, asserting that the District of Columbia “is always solidly Democratic and has an ethnic and racial composition that might be very unfavorable to the Trump Administration.” “So I see the significance not so much that he impaneled the grand jury – you have to impanel the grand jury to get subpoena power — but where he impaneled it.” Asked by Cosby whether the second grand jury “stacks the deck” against Trump, Dershowitz says he believes it does.;

It's in Washington D.C. where only 4% voted for - Trump. If the population from

[ In Reply To ..]
which the jury pool will be taken voted against Trump 96% to 4% you can figure it out. I believe the defense has a limited number of strikes to dismiss jurors.

A second GJ in Northern VA, 90% to 10% (govt employees, feds, etc) voted Democrat.

I hope we can have a civil discussion about this and not all based on political parties.

In my opinion, - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
and I state that outright, if an innocent man wants cleared of any wrongdoing, it shouldn't matter who clears him. And I know if I personally wasn't worried or had nothing to hide I would welcome anyone to prove that I'm right. If there's proof or evidence of anything, it will be hard to defend against no matter who is on the jury. They're following the money, there's a reason trump never released his taxes like he promised. He started talking about who he can pardon including himself. So me personally, if it were me IMO, feel if there's a need for a grand jury, then bring it. Party lines shouldn't matter to a man with nothing to hide.

This all seems like fishing to me. In order to have a special - counsel, a crime must first be committed, not

[ In Reply To ..]
found out after the fact. This is the legal definition. That's why this all seems political to me.

Nope - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
"As a result of Watergate, in 1977 Congress passed the Ethics in Government Act (EGA). The process of appointing an independent counsel began with the filing of an application by the AG with the Special Division. The Act required the application to "contain sufficient information to assist the Special Division in selecting an independent counsel and in defining the independent counsel's jurisdiction... to fully investigate and prosecute the subject matter and related matters."

In other words if there's smoke, there's usually fire.

You cannot appoint a special counsel and investigator - without an underlying crime

[ In Reply To ..]
That was back in the days when we had laws that were obeyed.

This is fishing. When this doesn't pain out they'll go after something else, like this rent thing now.
When what doesn't - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
pan out? There's an investigation. There's a reason for the investigation. There's a post above that explains the act that was put into place during Watergate to appoint independent counsel. There's a reason for this investigation and if a grand jury is appointed, there's a reason for that too.
You have to have a crime to appoint a special counsel, - not investigating if there is a crime,
[ In Reply To ..]
but actual proof of a crime.
What makes you think there is no proof? Did you expect...sm - VTMT
[ In Reply To ..]
all the evidence would be made public? Do you think you are in a position to make an informed decision about gathered evidence??
Seriously? - ???
[ In Reply To ..]
???
If there was proof, it would be the headlines 24/7 - by all MSM. It would have been leaked to
[ In Reply To ..]
the NYT and Washington Post.

This lack of knowledge about legals of the special counsel and - GJ by journalists is like that Jim
[ In Reply To ..]
Acosta CNN "journalist" who didn't even know the history of the State of Liberty.

You know anything would spilled all over Twitter anyway.

What makes you think there is proof? - Besides your Liberal Fascist talking points?
[ In Reply To ..]
??
WHat makes you think - there isn't? Other
[ In Reply To ..]
than your own delusions?
YOU'RE REPEATING YOUR INSULTS - OR IS THAT THE SYBILS??
[ In Reply To ..]
After almost a full year - nothing burgers.

Funny how you employ "delusional" thought process you accuse others of when it comes to Clinton, Obama, and the countless idiots they all surrounded themselves with, with massive evidence of lay breaking, cover ups, destruction of evidence. And you attack others as being delusional!
Are you aware - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
there's a grand jury about to be impaneled for Mueller's investigation? And nothingburger would be true if the investigation was over and turned up nothing, but that's not the case. Funny how there's no grand jury being comprised for any of the names you mentioned. Wonder why that is.
Are you aware that a Grand Jury - Nahhhh, we know you are not. Never mind
[ In Reply To ..]
Are you aware your delusions are showing AGAIN!
No you need - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
information requiring further investigation. That's what's needed. Obviously they have what they need. Do you really think you know more than the federal law?

Me too. In fact, in a grand juyr the subject isn't entitled to - defense as they are not yet charged

[ In Reply To ..]
with anything. Which makes me think of the special counsel because it used to be legally there had to be an ACTUAL crime committed to even have one. No investigation to find a crime, but an actual crime.

This is all political.

Dershowitz knows about juries. He was on the - OJ team. This only reinforces

[ In Reply To ..]
the appearance that this is a political operation rather than a legal operation.

I know if this Obama or Hillary or any other Democrat - had a jury and prosecution team

[ In Reply To ..]
stacked with Republicans what the answer would be. I think we have lost the ability to think critically about things.

Derschowitz seems to be able to do that, even though he admittedly voted for Hillary.

As far as I know, there is no defense in grand jury - proceedings. That's why people

[ In Reply To ..]
say you can indict a ham sandwich. The GJ only hears one side of the story and nothing else.

Clinton/Kaine received 90.9% of the DC vote and Trump/Pence 4.1%.

The chances of drawing any jury that reflects the composition of the remainder of the United States from DC area residents is effectively zero.

Well maybe he is just - jealous that he

[ In Reply To ..]
was not asked to join them. He did help get OJ off, so he must think he is at the top of any lawyer list. Just because people donate to a particular party does not mean that they won't be objective! Everyone in DC, republican and democrat alike, has said that Mueller is honest and trustworthy to handle this. Maybe we should not speculate and let him get to it!

Wel, I know I wouldn't want Maxine Waters on my - jury. I KNOW she would not be

[ In Reply To ..]
objective.

And - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
someone like Mike Huckabee would though, right. Of course. Works both ways.

Similar Messages:


Democratic Loyalist Alan Dershowitz Threatening To Leave The PartyJan 03, 2017
Wow, Obama really did let him down, but this is much, much worse. What are those dems thinking? ...

Racial ProfilingMay 05, 2011
My young adult son whose dad is from a Moslem Middle Eastern country has recently been the target of 4 episodes of racial profilng in the past 2 weeks.  The last time this past Saturday was particularly brutal.  When he told me about it it was extremely painful for him to say and for me to hear, so much so I was unable to differentiate between my own pain and his.  He is typically an easy-going laid back guy, but ever since this happened he has been either enra ...

Racial Profiling CartoonJan 04, 2010
Hope this opens for you. It is so good.From Washington Posthttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv...d=opinionsbox1 ...

Racial Double Standard?Jan 11, 2010
If anyone else said this they would be fired immediately.  http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/01/10/reid-mounted-aggressive-campaign-minimize-obama-negro-comment/ ...

Playing Racial GamesNov 09, 2014
"After New York Police Commissioner Bill Bratton chose a  black man to replace another  black man as his deputy, a reporter asked Mayor de Blasio if the replacement “had to be a person of color.” “No,” the mayor claimed. That’s not a little white lie. This is a case where whites need not apply. Across the land, racially charged disputes are grabbing headlines. Broad swaths of life, including school admissions, crime statistics, income and poverty le ...

Obama: Racial Tensions Not Increasing.Dec 26, 2014
As control of Congress shifts to the GOP next year, President Barack Obama said that also means a change in the Washington blame game.   “Now you’ve got Republicans in a position where it’s not enough for them simply to grind the wheels of Congress to a halt and then blame me,” Obama said in an interview with NPR after being asked about working with the next Congress.   Obama sat down with NPR’s Steve Inskeep for an interview last Thursday, the entiret ...

For Skeptics In Need Of Proof Of Racial Slur Tweets Nov 10, 2012
Partisan disdain for scientific data gathering notwithstanding, there ARE ways to measure this shameful phenomenon.   There are also plenty of screen shots from Twitter entries I do not have time to retrieve this morning. http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2012/nov/09/mapping-racist-tweets-president-obama-reelection#zoomed-picture    ...

Deep Racial Divide Remains Under ObamaSep 01, 2014
Excerpt: America’s racial divide not only remains but has deepened in some ways over the last six years, despite hopes President Obama’s election would usher in a “post-racial” America. ...

For Michelle Obama, 2014 Has Been A Year Of Racial StirringDec 29, 2014
If you were inclined to sympathize with Michelle Obama and conclude that her recent comments on racist behavior in Target were misconstrued, you’d be wise to consider the First Lady’s history. Michelle Obama’s complete u-turn when describing an interaction with a white lady asking for her help reaching groceries is not the first time she has used her status to misguidedly cry racism. Indeed, in May, the Inquisitr reported how Obama urged high school students to monitor their family and ...

Comcast And Al Sharpton Hit With $20 Billion Racial Discrimination LawsuitFeb 23, 2015
http://closedpress.com/comcast-and-al-sharpton-hit-with-$20-billion-racial-discrimination-lawsuit/ ...

Liberals Explode With Racial Hate After Tim Scott Wins Senate Race In S.C.Nov 06, 2014
Tell me again who the racists are because I'm quite confused.During the election, liberal Democrats used the race card in an attempt to label all Republicans as racist. But when Tim Scott won his Senate race in South Carolina, liberalson Twitter went ballistic, Twitchy said Tuesday, hurling racial slurs against Scott, even though he has the honor of being the first African-American elected to the Senate from that state and the first elected ...

Prosecutor Investigating Sandra Bland’s Death Has Troubling History Of Racial BiasJul 28, 2015
The Texas prosecutor who is investigating the suspicious death of a black woman while in custody was accused last year of sending threatening messages to a black pastor who had publicly criticized his handling of cases that involved minorities.Sandra Bland, an outspoken critic of police violence against black people, was found dead in a jail cell Monday, two days after the 28-year-old had been stopped by police for a lane change violation while on her way from Chicago to a ne ...

Giuliani Slams 'racial Arsonists,' Calls Ferguson Grand Jury's Decision 'correctNov 25, 2014
'The racial arsonists, who enjoyed last night — this was their day of glory,' former NYC mayor says. Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani said the grand jury'sdecision not to indict white police officer Darren Wilson in the fatal shooting of an unarmed black teenager, Michael Brown, was "correct" and the only one they could have reached in the racially charged case. "I believe it was a correct verdict," Giuliani said on CNN Tuesday. "In fact, I think it was t ...

Actor James Woods Just Issued A Challenge To Eric Holder To Prove He’s Not The Real Racial CowarSep 11, 2014
. ...