A community of 30,000 US Transcriptionist serving Medical Transcription Industry

"You want the perks. You don't want the job."


Posted: Aug 24, 2014

What Judge Jeanine Pirro said about out feckless leader on 08/23/2014 in her "open."

;

Excellent observation. Thank you Judge Pirro - Got to remember to watch her

[ In Reply To ..]
Her observations are always 100% correct.

Nobody's observations are always 100% correct. - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
Jeanine Pirro is that Fox News correspondent chiacchierone who reads the news like she's scolding a teenager for going through her alcohol stash and stealing all the "good stuff." I call her "the Butcher" because she reminds me of the character in the movie "Gangs of New York" with the weird eye. She points at the camera and talks in an accusatory tone and curses and uses the type of language that you'd expect to hear coming from a butcher shop in New Jersey. She sometimes seems surprised by the words she's saying, as if she's reading and hearing them for the first time along with her audience. She doesn't just go on a rant, she gets angry and serves up the red meat the Obama haters swallow whole.

She keeps reporting that Obama released Abu Bakr al Baghdadi, the current head of ISIS, from government custody in 2009. That is false. The other night she kept ranting about Austin County, Texas over and over. What an idiot! Austin County is west of Houston. She was talking about Travis County (City of Austin) and just kept calling it Austin County and saying how it was the only blue county in the completely red state of Texas.

Pointing my finger and scolding: Okay, Butcher, first off, it is Travis County, and secondly, it is NOT the only Democratic county in Texas. There are around 25, count them 25, other blue counties in Texas. What kind of moron "news" reporter can't get on the Internet and pull up a map of Texas counties shaded red and blue? No, Butcher, the Tom DeLay conviction was not "immediately overturned," unless you consider 3 years later as being "immediately."

And then suddenly I remember that somebody on this board had warned a poster to watch Judge Jeanine's show or risk looking "foolish" (or some other similar word).

Well, okay, I watched the show, and let me say this: The woman is clueless. If this is what you consider good news reporting when the facts are frequently wrong, then enjoy your misinformation, but while you're regurgitating it back, don't be surprised if you get corrected by someone with facts. It would not take much fact checking at all to verify everything she read off the screen while pointing and wagging her finger, so I can only conclude that the aim of this type reporting is to intentionally misinform people or that Jeanine Pirro is just plain ignorant about facts and merely reads what she is told and really has no idea when she totally gets it wrong.

I'm still laughing/amazed - Judge Jeanine Pirro

[ In Reply To ..]
Yeah, last night was pretty humorous when she was talking to people out in Napa Valley about the earthquake.

I had a friend over and when CNN was still stuck on John Walsh, we switched over to Fox to see if we could find out anything about the earthquake (they are usually good for at least sensationalist photography). The people she interviewed even looked amazed at her stupidity. We watched for a while and my friend eventually begged to change the channel to anything but FOX (I was chuckling). I keep telling her you have to understand where the "thought process" comes from.

Right now, instead of respectful coverage of the Michael Brown funeral, FOX is chewing on Sharpton and Jackson. Not productive, insightful or informative. Maybe they would like to cover the entire Jennings police department having been fired in 2011 due to police misconduct and federal funds fraud. (yes, indeed the infamous Darren Wilson was one of those officers dismissed).
Replying to "I'm still laughing/amazed" - eom
[ In Reply To ..]
She was like a chihuahua, funny for a second or two and then annoying the rest of the time. No offense to chihuahua's. They are just being themselves. Now for a judge to act that way . . .
She says exactly what most are thinking - nm
[ In Reply To ..]
xx

Yes, she's great. - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
I have to laugh at the rants by some of the other posters. I actually don't even read them after the first few words, but I see that they call her ignorant, etc. It's comical because she is one of the more intelligent, informed people out there in broadcast journalism. Who else has that kind of education and is a former judge? Too funny! The left is just so threatened by anyone other than Madcow and Thrill-Up-My-Leg Matthews. I guess MSNBC and their ilk have to keep it "real" for their level of viewers.

Let's not forget Al Sharpless and Sgt. Schultz. - Truthhurts

[ In Reply To ..]
Those are two warped people. Uh, is Sgt. Schultz still there? Haven't heard about him lately.
Geeze.... - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
Al boy has to insinuate himself into anything and everything that involves pulling the race card. Otherwise, no one knows he's there and he would be irrelevant.

Why the dislikes? Can't handle the truth? - He's a jerk.

[ In Reply To ..]
He's lazy, he's uninterested in leading this country. He needs to go. He should never have been elected to begin with as he had no experience to be able to lead. Only got elected through fraud and illiterate/illegal voters that were on the take.

The dislikes are because it is not true - nm

[ In Reply To ..]
dd

That's putting it mildly. - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
His legacy is going to be that of a feckless presidency, failing on many levels. His lack of leadership has led us back to Iraq and potentially worse with the rise of ISIS, you know, the "JV" terror group. He has no capacity for intelligent reasoning, no experience, no leadership skills. Just a good game of golf and yucking it up with his buddies.

It'll be okay. - sm

[ In Reply To ..]
Watch some more Fox and turn on some Rush for background noise. Since obviously intelligence means very little in this process maybe you will be able to elect a Rick Perry, Santorum, or Ted Cruz next time.
PeeWee Herman would even be an improvement over BO. - BTW, love FOX!!
[ In Reply To ..]
:-)
I started watching fox after all the flap here. - Wanted to see what it was about.
[ In Reply To ..]
I actually like it. Thanks for the heads up.
It has provided a lot of amusement - sometimes even hearty laughter
[ In Reply To ..]
Laughter is good for you...this could work.
Yes, laughter, but mostly what people say, that the - left is afraid of the truth.
[ In Reply To ..]
Otherwise, why would they bash it? Psychology 101. Simple. Period.
I think people DON'T like it because it DOESN'T - tell the truth. (NM)
[ In Reply To ..]
I guess that's why their ratings are the highest. - LOL
[ In Reply To ..]
Ca-ching!
There are a lot of shows of dubious quality - that have high ratings
[ In Reply To ..]
My only explanation is that people truly cannot tell fact from fiction. They prefer to have the low ball psychological drama presented on Fox to facts that one has to weigh and actually listen to educated analysis and then form opinions.
Ah, yes. Whenever you righties say "Period.", - that MUST mean it is true.
[ In Reply To ..]
I guess that's the latest catch-word to use when all the other snarky comments they have in their repertoire have been used up.
You can keep your health plan. - Period.
[ In Reply To ..]
That's where that came from. :-D
And I thought we were done with that! - sm
[ In Reply To ..]
I was laughing and you thought you were studying Psychology.

Guess, others had thoughts on that too....
Their hysterically warped news angles ARE - pretty funny to watch.
[ In Reply To ..]
[Laughing] - I think the upside there would be - all the fodder for comedians!
[ In Reply To ..]
That's the ONLY thing I miss about George Dubya. He was just TOO easy to get stand-up material from.

And think how much fun we missed out on when the Alaskan hockey-mom didn't make it into the vice-presidency. That would have probably killed what's left of the country, but at least we all would've died laughing.

Is "feckless" the right-wing word-of-the-day? - Gotta stay up on these things, ya know.

[ In Reply To ..]
.
No, actually, it's the word of several years to describe BO. - See msg.
[ In Reply To ..]
1: weak, ineffective
2: worthless, irresponsible

Insert pic of BO here...
Reply to "No actually, it's . . ." - eom
[ In Reply To ..]
LOL. So, by the definitions provided:
1. weak, ineffective
2. worthless, irresponsible

You do realize these two definitions fit the republican-controlled congress to a T.

Ex: Congress is spending taxpayer money on a feckless lawsuit rather than focusing on infrastructure, which could in turn lead to job creation.

Insert pics of republican congressmen/women here . . .
Sorry you can't come up with anything original. - Feckless equals BO. Period.
[ In Reply To ..]
LOL
Right-wing "wit" never ceases to amaze me. - Right when you think it cant possibly get
[ In Reply To ..]
any dumber, it DOES.

The dislikes are because a jerk wrote it. - True Dat

[ In Reply To ..]

Typical leftist drivel. I normally do not read/post on this board specifically because of comments - None

[ In Reply To ..]
nm

Similar Messages: